tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705078887057341738.post6205135633284531436..comments2024-03-19T07:30:55.288-04:00Comments on Curmudgeon: Snap JudgementsCurmudgeonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04323026187622872114noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705078887057341738.post-8270875879159331892014-04-14T16:02:14.270-04:002014-04-14T16:02:14.270-04:00Trade fairs are so vieux jeu. These are both hors...Trade fairs are so vieux jeu. These are both horse & buggy presentations compared to your average YouTube presentation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705078887057341738.post-40388333774199678112014-04-14T12:15:42.009-04:002014-04-14T12:15:42.009-04:00This is a great post. At the heart of what you'...This is a great post. At the heart of what you're getting at, as I interpret it, is that "21st century education" hasn't shifted, it has expanded. In the old days, transmissive classroom style learning was the only way to teach...now it's just one of many options available. Unfortunately, many want to ascribe some sort of inherent evilness to that particular style, rather than deciding educational design based on situation. Glenhttp://apointofcontact.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705078887057341738.post-40202907405481034172014-04-13T16:47:03.151-04:002014-04-13T16:47:03.151-04:00I love what you do at Desmos, because it's und...I love what you do at Desmos, because it's undeniably obvious that all you want to do is connect with educators and make math education better. No company can "sell" that. (I think Simon Sinek had a famous book onthat idea...) <br />As a dedicated, thoughtful, reflective teacher, it's frustrating to me to see TI run a booth like this. I have a background in accounting, so I took a look at their 10-K. 4% of their revenue in 2013 came from calculators.. Their statements to their investors explicitly says that their "investments [in the calculator segment] are minimal and growth expectations are much lower." It's like they have this strangle-hold on a market that they their corporation cares very little about. Most people know them for calculators, so they can use that name recognition to extend their outdated, expensive handhelds. Here's a good example of this: They haven't updated the TI-83 in maybe a decade. They did a decent update to the TI-84 and came out with a color version. The calculators don't function differently overall, but the 84 has many more features now (fractions, superscript, log base changing, stats wizards and so on). Yet they keep selling it next to the 84, for $20 less. When you are talking about a $100 calculator, $20 is a big chunk of change making it more attractive to students and parents. Maybe I'm wrong, but do other companies continue to sell their (more) obsolete products right along side their current line? <br />As far as the CEO is concerned, I'm sure if a concerned teacher went to him to complain about frustrations, his response would be, "We still sell calculators?"<br />Again, love everything Desmos comes out with. You've made a great product and connected a lot of educators to one another. Thank you for all you do to help us. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705078887057341738.post-87900848759104885432014-04-13T16:07:49.819-04:002014-04-13T16:07:49.819-04:00A lot to unpack here. I want to weigh in here with...A lot to unpack here. I want to weigh in here with a few thoughts. First, there were a ton of big booths and Texas Instrument's seemed, by far, to be the most trafficked. Texas Instruments is the foil that people see when they look at Desmos for one main reason: it has been *extremely* successful -- at sales, at marketing, at partnerships, and even at pedagogy, design, and technology. I learned to program on my TI-83 and loved it. Much as it's fun to denigrate a large faceless company that in many ways is holding onto the past, I think all of us at Desmos recognize how much we have to learn from them still.<br /><br />But to push back -- we had neither a big budget nor a sales agenda. Our goal at NCTM was to have as many conversations with teachers as we could. We wanted to answer questions, to ask our own, to get feedback on our new work, and to chat with the folks who have been supporting us over the last couple of years. <br /><br />I wouldn't want a classroom to look like our booth. But I'd sure love if more exhibitors treated the exhibit floor as a place to learn rather than to sell. I'd love if teachers felt comfortable coming over to TI, Casio, or Pearson to complain to the CEO/CTO about frustrations, or to chat about implicit graphing with the engineer who built it. I'd rather live in that world. Not just because the exhibit floor wouldn't feel like a soul-sucking shark-tank of sales pitches, but because every organization would put out better products as a result.Elihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04186309206490709215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705078887057341738.post-80212915377278327632014-04-13T16:05:12.728-04:002014-04-13T16:05:12.728-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Elihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04186309206490709215noreply@blogger.com