Take the notion that children have specific learning styles, that some are “visual learners” and others are auditory; some are “left-brain” students, others “right-brain.” In a recent review of the relevant research, published in the journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest, a team of psychologists found almost zero support for such ideas. “The contrast between the enormous popularity of the learning-styles approach within education and the lack of credible evidence for its utility is, in our opinion, striking and disturbing,” the researchers concluded.Hallelujah. Striking and disturbing, indeed.
I believe that mathematics should be taught, not collaboratively explored; algebra and geometry are better than a vague course of Integrated Math; spiraling doesn't work nearly as well as learning it properly the first time; "I don't DO math" should be an incentive rather than an excuse. "I don't DO English" should be treated the same way.
Pages
▼
Monday, September 6, 2010
Psychologists say NO to Learning Styles
I'll have to read the rest of this NYTimes article carefully, but this paragraph stood out:
Fantastic article. I just read it in its entirety, printed it, and emailed it to our math curriculum coordinator. I plan on reading it again later. I plan on sharing the suggestions in the article with my students. Thanks so much for sharing.
ReplyDeleteI wrote a commentary in regards to the article too. A few points came to my mind when I read the article as well. I am an early childhood teacher, specifically work with pre-k and kindergarten (and LOVE TEACHING math to them too) so my point of view is from the early childhood perspective.
ReplyDeletehttp://talesofasweetgirl.blogspot.com/2010/09/study-habits.html